roses

roses

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Memento



     Derek Jarman once said that film was, “The preserve of ambition and folly in pursuit of illusion, or delusion.” Memento, directed by Christopher Nolan, has an interesting storyline to attract speculation about illusions and delusions. Our protagonist, Leonard, suffers from a mental disorder called anterograde amnesia, which is the inability to convert short-term memories into long-term memories, caused by trauma to the head. The story follows Leonard on his journey for vengeance after his wife is supposedly raped and murdered. However, the most engaging aspect of the film is not the story itself, but the form in which it is told.  In Memento we see chronological order reversed, so that the (chronological) beginning of the story is the end of the film and vice versa. Another device Nolan uses is time lapses’. We see the film “backwards”,  but we also see the film in short burst shots, one scene (in the film) leading into the what happened previously (in the story), all done usually in five to ten minute segments, depending on the action. This device is used to emphasize Leonard’s condition thus; we are seeing the story through his point of view. This nonlinear structure emphasizes not only the story itself, but also how the viewer comes to understand the plot. It also allowed Nolan to play with our perceptions of character, as exhibited through Natalie and Teddy, and more importantly, Leonard.  The aspect of cinema that is emphasized when the form dominates the story line is the ability to engage the audience. Not just on an elementary level, but in such a way as to make the viewer not only question the ideas behind the story but also reality itself.
        Another cinematic device used throughout the film is the use of black and white for sequences that have either already happened, or is flashbacks for the characters. This helps the viewer isolate information from what is considered “live” and what is either a memory or just data. For this story to have a sense of mystery and ambiguity the content needs the nonlinear form used throughout the film. Form, how the story is told, affects the how the story is perceived; one cannot exist without the other. This particular form used for Memento, is what makes the film such an anomaly. Had Memento been told in a typical linear fashion, the story would still be interesting, but the viewer would not be engaged. All of the facts would have been laid bare, leaving no room for the audience to wonder if perhaps Natalie wasn’t really helping Leonard towards the “beginning” of the film, but rather getting her revenge on Teddy for the death of Jimmy, or if Teddy was being truthful, or was he the second attacker? All of the elements used throughout the film that make the viewer a little bit confused, is what makes Memento interesting. Nolan is challenging us to not just sit back, relax and consume, but to engage with our main character and understand his place in the story. From Leonard’s point of view we see that everything is going according to plan, until it’s not, and then is again. As a result of us observing through Leonard’s point of view, we must make deductions and assumptions and trust only what’s written on the back of a Polaroid, just like Leonard. Therefore we truly understand what our main character is experiencing, because we are experiencing it also, as opposed to simply absorbing it. Repetition was commonly used throughout the film. It emphasized our main characters cycle, and the fact that Leonard was often prone to retracing his steps and therefore providing the viewer with more information. It was also used to reveal Leonard’s inner monologue of remembering his wife's alleged murder. Through this we see Leonard repeating “facts” to himself and attempting to convince himself of the “truth”. The fact that he constantly tells the people around him about Sammy Jankis, is evidence of Leonard’s struggle to lie to himself. If he repeats it enough times, it’s no longer just a story, but a fact.  Another device used by Nolan, is the plot twist appearing at the end of the film, otherwise known as the “surprise ending”. This leaves the audience with a sense of shock but also, somewhat of, a resolution. We are not completely satisfied, but we are fulfilled enough to enjoy the entirety of the film. And from that last bit of information, we can now ponder the real force behind what drives each character. 
Nolan has said about Memento, “ I believe the answers are all there in the film, but the terms of the storytelling deliberately prevent people from finding them. If you watch the film, and abandon your conventional desire for absolute truth - and the confirmation of absolute truth that most films provide you with - then you can find all the answers you're looking for. As far as I'm concerned, my view is very much in the film - the answers are all there for the attentive viewer, but the terms of the storytelling prevent me from being able to give the audience absolute confirmation. And that's the point.” What the film exposes about the human psyche is that anyone can lie to themselves. They can manipulate their own brains into believing what is on the surface of their reality. A persons sense of justice can be altered with revision. This also proved true for the viewers of Memento, how our perspective of Leonard, Teddy, and Natalie changes so drastically from beginning to end, all with the illumination of Leonard’s true intentions. Leonard was not only fooling himself but also fooling us. Leonard appears to be our 3rd person, while simultaneously our narrator is also omniscient. We are given revealed to narrative information along with our main character, whose point of view we are experiencing. Memento was intricately conducted, and and quite arduous to understand. Still, we never lose focus of the story behind the complicated form in which it is delivered. Memento’s  story was cohesive, and it’s form provocative, proving that the way a story is told, and not just the story itself, can bend one’s perspective, question certainty, and become engaging for the masses.

Casablanca



Casablanca, directed by Michael Curtis, takes place in the early days of World War Two in unoccupied Africa. Our protagonist Rick Blaine, played by the brilliant Humphrey Bogart, is an American running the hottest nightclub in Casablanca. Our leading lady Ilsa Lund, played by Ingrid Bergman, is Rick’s one and only vice. After spending time together in Paris and falling in love with Ilsa, Rick is torn asunder when Isla inevitably abandons him on the evening they plan to escape German invasion and flee Paris. Years later in Casablanca, Ilsa and her husband Victor Laszlo, played by Paul Henreid, waltz into Rick’s nightclub, forever changing both of their fates. Another twist in our story comes about when Rick manages to find himself with two valuable letters of transit, something very scarce in Casablanca. 
As plots thicken and intentions unfold, we find Ilsa planning on staying in Casablanca with Rick, whom she realized she can’t live without, and Laszlo taking one of Rick’s  letters of transit and leaving Casablanca to finish his revolutionary work in fighting the Gestapo. The true story behind the many plots within this Hollywood hit is not the heroism displayed by both Rick and Laszlo,  nor is it the doomed romance between Ilsa and Rick, but the transformation that occurs with our main character. From being a man with only himself to ever care for, to becoming our unlikely hero by putting aside his own well-being to help others, Rick’s metamorphosis from someone rough around the edges to someone selfless and kind is what makes Casablanca a truly great film. It could be argued that it is not the sole reason why people prefer Rick to Laszlo, though popular believe veers towards the contrary, but what makes a character likeable is not his willingness to change, even from good to bad, but the fact that he is flawed and interesting enough to not need to change.

Arguably what makes Rick a favorite character for the masses is his shift from his bad boy selfish image, to a completely selfless and charmingly sweet hero. These changes seem not be gradual, in fact, more of a complete 180, despite the  “if you blink you miss it” clues peppered throughout the beginning of the film that prove Rick is more than a brood. A naive audience is, of course, thrown for a loop when we get our final switch on a switch to discover Rick’s new disposition. We are charmed and sad for Rick’s sacrifice and we love him despite his prior chagrin demeanor. Personally, I did not love Rick because of his transformation, but in spite of it. Sure, he saves the day, he helps the girl, he single handedly wins the war, yadda yadda yadda, Rick’s the hero. Then comes sympathy because our hero, for probably the first time in Hollywood history, did not get the girl. So we pity him. I love the ending, I can appreciate Rick’s sacrifice, and could totally see it coming, sorry Michael Curtis, but I believe that our anti-hero Rick is likable not only because his transformation, but because he’s honest and blunt and doesn’t care what others think about him. Rick is not a stock or flat character, like Laszlo, but round because he is complex and dynamic, because he changes. 
He is more human than a cardboard cutout with lines (again, Laszlo). In the beginning of the film it is obvious, not only through other characters dialogue but also in Rick’s constant facial expressions reading boredom, that Rick is a hard man to impress. He is also very reserved and self-involved, affirmed by his famous catchphrase, “ I stick my neck out for nobody.” We see the various temperaments of Rick throughout the film, from his obvious heart-break over Ilsa as he drinks, a lot, and remembers the happier times with her and their inevitable split, to his refusal to a member of the Deutsche Bank to the bar’s private back room, proving his political sympathy with the Allies, despite his proclaimed indifference. Although his ultimate sacrifice and transformation at the end of the film are what make Rick memorable and appealing, his disgruntled and chagrin demeanor from the very beginning, are what make him relatable and fascinating. Rick is a lovable character throughout the film, even with all of his imperfections, he is engaging and provocative. I can honestly say that Rick was interesting, mysterious and enigmatical from the very beginning which makes him the best character in Casablanca.


Does his transformation make him all the more memorable? Yes, it does. The audience likes the change in Rick, just as much as we like his character flaws before his sacrifice. Things like creep, or miscreant, mischiefmaker, and lowlife are all synonymous with the term “Anti-Hero”, which is how Rick has been described. If you look closely you will see that Rick is none of these things, yes, he is mysterious due to the fact that he is unable to return home, and we never learn exactly why, but a lowlife? Surely not. Clearly he is rough around the edges, giving the appearance of an anti-hero, someone callus and sometimes even offensive, but Rick is noble. And despite his catchphrase, “I stick my neck out for nobody.” we know he is the hero of this story. We root for him the entire time. He might more accurately be described as the under-dog. Someone who will redeem himself after being downtrodden.  Rick is a favorite character for the masses, not because he is an anti-hero, or because he changes, but because he is the underdog, and because he overcomes his trials with vigar. Everyone can relate to being down and out, and his ability to triumph is aspirational. Rick was the hero all along, and though he was disguised as an anti-hero, a villain of sorts, the audience knows that Rick is the heart and soul of Casablanca.